Ramifications of Word Processing Programs and Writing Software on Students’ Writing Ability

Ramifications of Word Processing Programs and Writing Software on Students’ Writing Ability

Introduction

Mixed reactions have since emerged in researches conducted to identify the effects of word processing programs and computer writing software on students’ writing capabilities. Some studies have shown positive effects towards the utilization of computer word processing programs. Having said that, others have indicated barely minimal difference between cases where the programs or software are employed by students (Swan 4). This paper will in effect establish if word processing programs and computer skill may either sharpen and even weaken college student’s writing skills.

Today, computer word processing programs have eased the editing means of correcting spelling mistakes, grammatical mistakes and sentence punctuations. Some word processors that are latest are even able put in text citations on student research papers Similarly, computer writing software are able to correct the mistakes and check for plagiarism of researched work. The advantages that come with word processors and these computer writing software would therefore definitely outweigh the negative impacts on students’ writing capabilities.

Among the disadvantages of word processing programs and writing software that weaken students’ knowledge on paper are; first, the term processing advances the probability of certain errors that are spellingNoel 106). Word processors causes unwanted modifications while spellchecking some errors ultimately causing some misspelt words or confused words (Noel 106). In relation that, students often believe word processors are often correct in spelling hence leaning more erroneous spellings from them. This in turn leads to more students having a complete lot of spelling errors within their typed or written work.

Secondly, computers tempt to substitute a person’s writing for thinking. The complete essence of writing is always to make sense to a audience that is particular a particular intension (Grow 218). As Grow observes;

They first wrote down (p.219) when they write with a computer, instead of rethinking their drafts for purpose, audience, content, strategy, and effectiveness, most untrained writers just keep editing the words.

This results college students handing in write-ups that do not sound right or without any flow that is proper of.

Another disadvantage is the fact that expressed word processors in computers enhances a lot more of collaborative writing (Grow 218). In a writing that is collaborative different write might not have the same ideas about tone, punctuation and sometimes even rhythm of these sentences. If so, a computer collaborative jot down by college students often do not make much meaning because of variations on what different writers put down their point (Ling 25). The effect is a write up with minimal flow of ideas from 1 writer to another which limits students from expressing their writing skills in group work which require a collaborative writing.

One of several factors that are limiting word processors is the fact that it becomes very hard for writers to obtain a synopsis of the work (Grow 220). Simply because word processors barely display more than twenty four lines of words at an instantaneous. This creates a sense that is no clear of hence writers end up with partially expressed ideas or recurrence of ideas.

Although the use of word processors produces a well presented write ups, it limits the students’ power to improve on their hand written work. The emergence of computer era has affected greatly students handwriting that is. Students are used to typing their work on computers rather than putting them on pen and paper, the results is a poorly presented hand written work today. (Ling 76). Hand writing is very important for student in putting across a tactile hand written idea. Hence a write up not well written limits student writing capability.

The only mentionable disadvantage of computer writing softwares is that, existence of various softwares does not have a substandard grading system on students’ writing capability on the other hand. The effect to unbalance student self-evaluation. (Ling 76). Students often concentrate on the software evaluation for their writing forgetting that the software have their limitations so far as writing is concerned. The result is a learning student generation with minimal writing skills.

Using computers in class is effective since students that have mustered their computer keys are able to write their work pretty fast in comparison to a work which will be hand that is being by paper and pen (Hamel 1). The theory in this fact is buyable because in evaluating students skills that are writing speed with accuracy is a feature that is always considered. Thus a student is able to turn in a proper jot down with minimal mistakes at a short time.

Another advantage about some type of computer is the fact that each keystroke corresponds to a letter that is particularGraham 6). Taking into consideration the undeniable fact that a computer displays letters dialed in the screen, it could therefore be credited with correct spellings of words. Therefore, a college student who definitely has undergone preliminary childhood education could easily notice a spelling mistake and correct it through a word program document. This can be unlike the hand written job where one could easily do a lot of spelling mistakes. The end result is improved skills that are writing to mastery of great spellings (Ling 123).

Computer word processing guarantees student a write-up that will be an easy task to revise, and add ideas or remove statements that are vague. (Graham 6). This often encourage writers to do more writing unlike hand written work where once a mistake is done then the document that is whole to be rewritten. The convenience with which writers can write different kinds of job with fewer discouragements improves skills that are writing.

Computer word processing improves students’ interactivity into the matter that is subject of writing (Hamel 1). The fact that word processing program indicates when there is a problem with grammar, sentence structure and spelling mistakes by underlining where there is a challenge, encourages the student to get more involved to the writing by doing his researches properly to avoid such mistakes. Mistakes corrected often stick into the mind of this learning student therefore improving his writing skills (Hamel 1).

Another advantageous asset of word processing is an organization that is easy of.(Hamel 1) Word processing software is connected to other electronic sources like the grammar and plagiarism checkers that are online (Graham 7). The checkers dig deeper to the information on the ongoing strive to include checks on flows of ideas in relation to other people’s work. The result is therefore a more organized work from students.

Reference to these, computer writing software have also greatly impacted on route university students write today. Based on Fang, a study conducted aimed to research the perception of a computer assisted writing program among EFL College learners indicated that;

Almost all students held attitudes that are favorable using MyAccess as a writing tool, but were less positive concerning its use as an essay grading tool. Evidence obtained from a choice that is multiple in the survey revealed that a lot of the students benefited by making use of the computer-mediated feedback to revise their essays. Moreover, interview data revealed that the computer-mediated feedback had a positive influence on writing skill development, particularly in suggesting changes for form in the place of for content. Finally, eight associated with the nine interview participants suggested that MyAccess could be employed in future writing (p.246).

With this research, it really is clear that computer assisted programs have grown to be more advantageous to learners writing development. Researchers currently emphasize making use of computer aided writing in mastering of second language (Fang 247). Simply because the editor function in this software improves vocabulary, word usage, sentences spelling and structuring(Fang 252). Having said that, the tutor function on this program can be as well useful correction of grammar (Fang 247). That is an illustration that these softwares improve students writing capabilities.

An additional benefit for this is the fact that the automated grading system followed closely by this software helps students evaluate their writing development very easily on their own (Fang 252). The reality that a student can write and do self-evaluation by his score college assignments online on writing, improves a student writing skills because he is able to constantly gauge his degree of writing at any particular moment.

Conclusion

In summary, the advantages that come along with word program that is processing as grammar correction, proper sentence structuring, and students’ interactivity amongst others outweigh the disadvantages that this system imposes on students’ writing development. Having said that, writing software carries along more advantageous asset of student self-evaluation that makes it more reliable on sharpening students’ writing capabilities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *